| | | | | | |

Core i5-4210U vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 3.8 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
50657
Core
Haswell
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2014
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4210U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
2.95k
1.97k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
7.38k
8.15k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
2.37k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
4.84k (x1.66)
TOTAL
16.35k
17.32k (x1.06)

Multithread

i5-4210U

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.86k
15.73k (x3.24)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
64.78k (x3.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.09k
18.06k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
5.21k (x2.08)
TOTAL
31.86k
103.77k (x3.26)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
12.92k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
10.97k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
2.54k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
5.09k (x1.87)
TOTAL
27.41k
31.52k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-4210U

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
103.33k (x3.59)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
87.67k (x4.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
20.1k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
4.91k (x1.88)
TOTAL
57.58k
216.02k (x3.75)

Performance/W
i5-4210U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4