| | | | | | |

Core i5-4210U vs Pentium 4417U


Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the 4417U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4210U is 1.1 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
806ea
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2014
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
41.15k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
7.94k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
11.35k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
2.39k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
2.8k (x0.96)
TOTAL
23.95k
24.49k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-4210U

4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
13.1k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
21.1k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
4.49k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
2.46k (x0.99)
TOTAL
45.22k
41.15k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i5-4210U
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
1169 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1171 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
510 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
3015 points/W
2743 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3038 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1322 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1083 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
8872 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4