| | | | | | |

Core i5-4210U vs i7-6900K


Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-6900K is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 7.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
406f1
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2014
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
49.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
427.51k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
23.11k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
17.84k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
5.34k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
3.47k (x1.27)
TOTAL
27.41k
49.76k (x1.82)

Multithread

i5-4210U

i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
184.19k (x6.4)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
181.2k (x9.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
47.44k (x6.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
14.69k (x5.64)
TOTAL
57.58k
427.51k (x7.42)

Performance/W
i5-4210U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
1316 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
3054 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
6247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
4822 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
1444 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
13450 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4