Core i5-4210U vs i5-10400T
Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 5.3 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 5.3 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4210U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.95k
4k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
7.38k
14.19k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
4.62k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
11.03k (x3.79)
TOTAL
16.35k
33.84k (x2.07)
Multithread
i5-4210U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.86k
22.77k (x4.69)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
96.59k (x5.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.09k
31.65k (x4.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
2.45k (x0.98)
TOTAL
31.86k
153.46k (x4.82)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
12.61k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
17.94k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
4.83k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
10.81k (x3.7)
TOTAL
23.95k
46.19k (x1.93)
Multithread
i5-4210U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
74.62k (x4.26)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
119.63k (x6.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
32.65k (x4.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
2.52k (x1.01)
TOTAL
45.22k
229.42k (x5.07)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4210U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.05k
12.5k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
5.31k
19.05k (x3.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
4.72k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.41k
10.3k (x7.31)
TOTAL
13.87k
46.57k (x3.36)
Multithread
i5-4210U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.01k
74.58k (x8.28)
Test#2 (FP)
16.3k
126.96k (x7.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.64k
31.76k (x6.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
2.5k (x1.16)
TOTAL
32.1k
235.8k (x7.35)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
22k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
19.98k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
4.57k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
11.31k (x4.15)
TOTAL
27.41k
57.85k (x2.11)
Multithread
i5-4210U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
136.69k (x4.75)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
135.25k (x7.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
32.76k (x4.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.48k (x0.95)
TOTAL
57.58k
307.18k (x5.33)
Performance/W
i5-4210U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4