| | | | | | |

Core i5-4210U vs Celeron N5105


Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.

Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
906c0
Core
Haswell
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2014
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
64.09k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
9.83k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
9.74k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
3.65k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
3.88k (x1.33)
TOTAL
23.95k
27.1k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-4210U

N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
25.04k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
24.7k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
9.29k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
5.06k (x2.04)
TOTAL
45.22k
64.09k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i5-4210U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1169 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1171 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
510 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
3015 points/W
6409 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3038 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1322 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1083 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
8872 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4