Core i5-4210U vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 7.5 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 7.5 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
800f82
Core
Haswell
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2014
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
431.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4210U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2.95k
4.25k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
7.38k
19.72k (x2.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
5.84k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
21.36k (x7.34)
TOTAL
16.35k
51.17k (x3.13)
Multithread
i5-4210U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.86k
35.04k (x7.21)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
181.42k (x10.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.09k
64.86k (x9.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
8.21k (x3.28)
TOTAL
31.86k
289.54k (x9.09)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
15.22k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
24.12k (x2.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
5.87k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
21k (x7.18)
TOTAL
23.95k
66.21k (x2.76)
Multithread
i5-4210U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
126.81k (x7.23)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
229.86k (x13.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
61.74k (x8.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
9.77k (x3.93)
TOTAL
45.22k
428.19k (x9.47)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4210U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5.05k
14.44k (x2.86)
Test#2 (FP)
5.31k
24.92k (x4.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
5.8k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.41k
19.07k (x13.54)
TOTAL
13.87k
64.24k (x4.63)
Multithread
i5-4210U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
9.01k
122.01k (x13.55)
Test#2 (FP)
16.3k
220.34k (x13.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.64k
59.89k (x12.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
9.9k (x4.59)
TOTAL
32.1k
412.13k (x12.84)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
15.34k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
25.75k (x3.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
5.79k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
17.95k (x6.59)
TOTAL
27.41k
64.83k (x2.37)
Multithread
i5-4210U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
123.07k (x4.28)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
239.3k (x12.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
60.6k (x8.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
8.18k (x3.14)
TOTAL
57.58k
431.14k (x7.49)
Performance/W
i5-4210U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4