Core i5-4210U vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 6 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 6 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
870f10
Core
Haswell
Matisse
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2014
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4210U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.95k
4.2k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
7.38k
17.36k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
7.5k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
23.79k (x8.18)
TOTAL
16.35k
52.85k (x3.23)
Multithread
i5-4210U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.86k
22.11k (x4.55)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
108.04k (x6.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.09k
56.81k (x8.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
36.39k (x14.55)
TOTAL
31.86k
223.36k (x7.01)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
15.38k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
21.94k (x2.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
7.97k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
24.76k (x8.47)
TOTAL
23.95k
70.05k (x2.92)
Multithread
i5-4210U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
96.91k (x5.53)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
135.12k (x7.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
70.39k (x9.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
56.43k (x22.69)
TOTAL
45.22k
358.85k (x7.94)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4210U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.05k
15.04k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
5.31k
20.95k (x3.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
8.57k (x4.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.41k
21.71k (x15.41)
TOTAL
13.87k
66.27k (x4.78)
Multithread
i5-4210U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
9.01k
94.36k (x10.48)
Test#2 (FP)
16.3k
141.73k (x8.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.64k
69.38k (x14.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
32.72k (x15.17)
TOTAL
32.1k
338.19k (x10.53)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
16.04k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
24.47k (x3.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
8.38k (x2.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
21.66k (x7.96)
TOTAL
27.41k
70.55k (x2.57)
Multithread
i5-4210U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
113.63k (x3.95)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
143.55k (x7.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
63.84k (x8.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
27.34k (x10.5)
TOTAL
57.58k
348.35k (x6.05)
Performance/W
i5-4210U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4