Core i5-4210U vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
810f10
Core
Haswell
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2014
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2.95k
3.8k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
7.38k
17.38k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
5.17k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
3.16k (x1.09)
TOTAL
16.35k
29.52k (x1.81)
Multithread
i5-4210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.86k
15.28k (x3.14)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
76.44k (x4.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.09k
27.48k (x3.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
3.02k (x1.21)
TOTAL
31.86k
122.2k (x3.84)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
13.95k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
20.7k (x2.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
5.33k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
3.03k (x1.04)
TOTAL
23.95k
43.01k (x1.8)
Multithread
i5-4210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
58.56k (x3.34)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
92.95k (x5.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
28.55k (x3.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
2.98k (x1.2)
TOTAL
45.22k
183.04k (x4.05)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5.05k
13.04k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
5.31k
22.35k (x4.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
5.37k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.41k
3.4k (x2.41)
TOTAL
13.87k
44.15k (x3.18)
Multithread
i5-4210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
9.01k
56.49k (x6.27)
Test#2 (FP)
16.3k
100.74k (x6.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.64k
28.21k (x6.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
3.04k (x1.41)
TOTAL
32.1k
188.49k (x5.87)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
14.2k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
23.23k (x2.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
5.35k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
5.18k (x1.9)
TOTAL
27.41k
47.96k (x1.75)
Multithread
i5-4210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
58.24k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
105.72k (x5.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
28.73k (x3.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
5.59k (x2.15)
TOTAL
57.58k
198.27k (x3.44)
Performance/W
i5-4210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4