Core i5-4210U vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 4.7 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 4.7 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
800f11
Core
Haswell
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2014
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
13.67k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
22.28k (x2.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
4.99k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
15.22k (x5.59)
TOTAL
27.41k
56.16k (x2.05)
Multithread
i5-4210U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
81.03k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
145.84k (x7.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
39.14k (x5.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
6.79k (x2.61)
TOTAL
57.58k
272.8k (x4.74)
Performance/W
i5-4210U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4