Core i5-4210U vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 2.7 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 2.7 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
810f10
Core
Haswell
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2014
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
157.54k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
13.75k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
22.58k (x2.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
4.99k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
3.55k (x1.3)
TOTAL
27.41k
44.87k (x1.64)
Multithread
i5-4210U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
50.99k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
84.4k (x4.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
18.95k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
3.2k (x1.23)
TOTAL
57.58k
157.54k (x2.74)
Performance/W
i5-4210U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
2424 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4