Core i5-4210U vs Ryzen 3 1200
Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 2 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 2 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
800f11
Core
Haswell
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2014
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
117.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
11.73k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
18.85k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
4.22k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
2.76k (x1.01)
TOTAL
27.41k
37.55k (x1.37)
Multithread
i5-4210U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
38.56k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
62.21k (x3.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
13.7k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
3.33k (x1.28)
TOTAL
57.58k
117.81k (x2.05)
Performance/W
i5-4210U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
1812 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4