| | | | | | |

Core i5-3470S vs i5-7300U


Description
The i5-3470S is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3470S gets a score of 93.4 k points while the i5-7300U gets 84.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3470S is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.35k points
48.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.35k points
109.1k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3470S
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.41k
9.85k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
10.98k
17.37k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
3.98k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.66k
5.11k (x1.1)
TOTAL
31.35k
36.31k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-3470S

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
35.73k
25.37k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
36k
43.43k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.48k
10.62k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
5.4k (x0.76)
TOTAL
93.35k
84.82k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i5-3470S
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
550 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
554 points/W
2896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
708 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
1436 points/W
5655 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3470S
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3168 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3050 points/GHz
4962 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1197 points/GHz
1137 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1293 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
TOTAL
8708 points/GHz
10376 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4