| | | | | | |

Core i5-3470S vs i7-7020U


Description
The i5-3470S is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3470S gets a score of 93.4 k points while the i7-7020U gets 60.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3470S is 1.6 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806ea
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
31.35k points
33.63k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.35k points
73.15k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3470S
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.41k
8.17k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
10.98k
12.42k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
2.87k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.66k
4.68k (x1.01)
TOTAL
31.35k
28.13k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-3470S

i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
35.73k
17.65k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
36k
30.44k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.48k
7.19k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
4.79k (x0.67)
TOTAL
93.35k
60.07k (x0.64)

Performance/W
i5-3470S
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
550 points/W
1177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
554 points/W
2029 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
479 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
320 points/W
TOTAL
1436 points/W
4005 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3470S
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
3168 points/GHz
3550 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3050 points/GHz
5399 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1197 points/GHz
1247 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1293 points/GHz
2035 points/GHz
TOTAL
8708 points/GHz
12231 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4