| | | | | | |

Core i5-3470 vs Xeon Silver 4208


Description
The i5-3470 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3470 gets a score of 77 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 141.3 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-3470 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
50657
Core
Ivy Bridge
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
77 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
June 2012
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.71k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
94.15k points
311.57k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3470
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3.62k
2.59k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
10.08k
9.5k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
3.15k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
5.9k (x1.09)
TOTAL
23.56k
21.13k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-3470

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
21.09k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
37.73k
80.93k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.07k
30.76k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.57k
8.51k (x0.99)
TOTAL
77.04k
141.3k (x1.83)

Performance/W
i5-3470
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
177 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
490 points/W
952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
222 points/W
362 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
111 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
1000 points/W
1662 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3470
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
1005 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2801 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1240 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1498 points/GHz
1843 points/GHz
TOTAL
6544 points/GHz
6604 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4