| | | | | | |

Core i5-3470 vs i7-4820K


Description
Both models i5-3470 and i7-4820K are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.

"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3470 gets a score of 94.1 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1.4 times faster than the i5-3470 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
306e4
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge -E
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
77 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2012
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
31.71k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
94.15k points
134.08k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3470
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
11.85k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
11.12k
11.84k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
4.69k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.64k
4.12k (x0.89)
TOTAL
31.71k
32.49k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-3470

i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
37.93k
47.65k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
36.37k
54.81k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.14k
21.56k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.71k
10.05k (x1.76)
TOTAL
94.15k
134.08k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i5-3470
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
493 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
472 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
184 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
1223 points/W
1031 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3470
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3196 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3090 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1234 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1289 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
8809 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4