Core i5-3437U vs i5-2410M
Description
The i5-3437U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3437U gets a score of 30.5 k points while the i5-2410M gets 38.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3437U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3437U gets a score of 30.5 k points while the i5-2410M gets 38.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3437U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/2
TDP
17 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2013
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
14.65k points
20.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.46k points
38.68k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3437U
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.96k
7.38k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
5.67k
6.76k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.91k
3.3k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.11k
2.66k (x1.26)
TOTAL
14.65k
20.1k (x1.37)
Multithread
i5-3437U
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.4k
14.17k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
12.73k
14.71k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.34k
6.93k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.99k
2.87k (x0.96)
TOTAL
30.46k
38.68k (x1.27)
Performance/W
i5-3437U
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
612 points/W
405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
749 points/W
420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
255 points/W
198 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
176 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
1792 points/W
1105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3437U
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
1710 points/GHz
2543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1954 points/GHz
2332 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
659 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
917 points/GHz
TOTAL
5051 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4