| | | | | | |

Core i5-3437U vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i5-3437U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3437U gets a score of 30.5 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 6.2 times faster than the i5-3437U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
810f10
Core
Ivy Bridge
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/8
TDP
17 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
14.65k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.46k points
198.27k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3437U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.96k
13.04k (x2.63)
Test#2 (FP)
5.67k
22.35k (x3.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.91k
5.37k (x2.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.11k
3.4k (x1.61)
TOTAL
14.65k
44.15k (x3.01)

Multithread

i5-3437U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
10.4k
56.49k (x5.43)
Test#2 (FP)
12.73k
100.74k (x7.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.34k
28.21k (x6.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.99k
3.04k (x1.02)
TOTAL
30.46k
188.49k (x6.19)

Performance/W
i5-3437U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
612 points/W
869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
749 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
255 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
176 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
1792 points/W
2900 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3437U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1710 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1954 points/GHz
5731 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
659 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
TOTAL
5051 points/GHz
11321 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4