| | | | | | |

Core i5-3340M vs i5-9500T


Description
The i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i5-9500T gets 211.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 3.4 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
906ea
Core
Ivy Bridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2 /2
6/6
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2013
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.58k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
62.75k points
274.02k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3340M
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
13.46k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
11.13k
20.21k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
4.72k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
10.25k (x2.26)
TOTAL
31.58k
48.64k (x1.54)

Multithread

i5-3340M

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
74.65k (x3.3)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
110.86k (x4.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.42k
22.08k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.12k (x0.97)
TOTAL
62.75k
211.7k (x3.37)

Performance/W
i5-3340M
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
645 points/W
2133 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
728 points/W
3167 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
631 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
1793 points/W
6049 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3340M
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3384 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3273 points/GHz
5462 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1337 points/GHz
2771 points/GHz
TOTAL
9288 points/GHz
13145 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4