Core i5-3340M vs i5-7300U
Description
The i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i5-7300U gets 84.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i5-7300U gets 84.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.58k points
48.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
62.75k points
109.1k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3340M
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
9.85k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
11.13k
17.37k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
3.98k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
5.11k (x1.13)
TOTAL
31.58k
36.31k (x1.15)
Multithread
i5-3340M
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
25.37k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
43.43k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.42k
10.62k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
5.4k (x1.27)
TOTAL
62.75k
84.82k (x1.35)
Performance/W
i5-3340M
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
645 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
728 points/W
2896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
708 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
1793 points/W
5655 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3340M
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3384 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3273 points/GHz
4962 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/GHz
1137 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1337 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
TOTAL
9288 points/GHz
10376 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4