Core i5-3340M vs i5-7300HQ
Description
The i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 134.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 2.1 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 134.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 2.1 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
906e9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.58k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
62.75k points
168.81k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3340M
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
11.59k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
11.13k
17.89k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
4.14k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
7.88k (x1.73)
TOTAL
31.58k
41.5k (x1.31)
Multithread
i5-3340M
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
44.42k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
67.5k (x2.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.42k
14.6k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
8.06k (x1.9)
TOTAL
62.75k
134.58k (x2.14)
Performance/W
i5-3340M
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
645 points/W
987 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
728 points/W
1500 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
324 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
179 points/W
TOTAL
1793 points/W
2991 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3340M
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3384 points/GHz
3310 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3273 points/GHz
5112 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/GHz
1183 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1337 points/GHz
2252 points/GHz
TOTAL
9288 points/GHz
11857 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4