| | | | | | |

Core i5-3340M vs i5-7200U


Description
The i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i5-7200U gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2013
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.58k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
62.75k points
97.52k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3340M
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
11.36k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
11.13k
17.26k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
4.03k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
4.77k (x1.05)
TOTAL
31.58k
37.42k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-3340M

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
24.08k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
41.23k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.42k
10.19k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.72k (x1.11)
TOTAL
62.75k
80.22k (x1.28)

Performance/W
i5-3340M
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
645 points/W
1605 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
728 points/W
2749 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
679 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
315 points/W
TOTAL
1793 points/W
5348 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3340M
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3384 points/GHz
3666 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3273 points/GHz
5569 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1337 points/GHz
1537 points/GHz
TOTAL
9288 points/GHz
12072 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4