Core i5-3340M vs i5-6400
Description
The i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-6400 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i5-6400 gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i5-6400 gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
506e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2013
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
31.58k points
48.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
62.75k points
174.05k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3340M
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
11.82k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
11.13k
18.36k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
4.43k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
4.95k (x1.09)
TOTAL
31.58k
39.56k (x1.25)
Multithread
i5-3340M
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
46.04k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
69.47k (x2.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.42k
16.33k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
7.74k (x1.82)
TOTAL
62.75k
139.58k (x2.22)
Performance/W
i5-3340M
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
645 points/W
708 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
728 points/W
1069 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
251 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
1793 points/W
2147 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3340M
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
3384 points/GHz
3583 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3273 points/GHz
5563 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/GHz
1341 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1337 points/GHz
1500 points/GHz
TOTAL
9288 points/GHz
11987 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4