Core i5-3340M vs i5-10300H
Description
The i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.5 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.5 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
a0652
Core
Ivy Bridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.58k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
62.75k points
246.07k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3340M
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
15.65k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
11.13k
23.13k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
5.66k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
11.43k (x2.51)
TOTAL
31.58k
55.87k (x1.77)
Multithread
i5-3340M
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
26.77k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
43.81k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.42k
10.17k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
11.91k (x2.8)
TOTAL
62.75k
92.66k (x1.48)
Performance/W
i5-3340M
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
645 points/W
595 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
728 points/W
974 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
1793 points/W
2059 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3340M
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3384 points/GHz
3477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3273 points/GHz
5141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1337 points/GHz
2540 points/GHz
TOTAL
9288 points/GHz
12415 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4