| | | | | | |

Core i5-3340M vs i3-9100T


Description
The i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i3-9100T gets 147.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 2.4 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
906eb
Core
Ivy Bridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2013
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.58k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
62.75k points
192.88k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3340M
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
13.6k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
11.13k
20.58k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
4.76k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
8.8k (x1.94)
TOTAL
31.58k
47.74k (x1.51)

Multithread

i5-3340M

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
50.18k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
75.99k (x2.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.42k
17.66k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.12k (x0.97)
TOTAL
62.75k
147.95k (x2.36)

Performance/W
i5-3340M
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
645 points/W
1434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
728 points/W
2171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
505 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
1793 points/W
4227 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3340M
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3384 points/GHz
3676 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3273 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1337 points/GHz
2378 points/GHz
TOTAL
9288 points/GHz
12902 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4