Core i5-3340M vs i3-9100
Description
The i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i3-9100 gets 164.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 2.6 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i3-9100 gets 164.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 2.6 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
906eb
Core
Ivy Bridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2013
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.58k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
62.75k points
229.2k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3340M
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
14.81k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
11.13k
22.15k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
5.42k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
4.8k (x1.06)
TOTAL
31.58k
47.17k (x1.49)
Multithread
i5-3340M
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
52.08k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
87.45k (x3.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.42k
20.98k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.24k (x1)
TOTAL
62.75k
164.75k (x2.63)
Performance/W
i5-3340M
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
645 points/W
801 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
728 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
323 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
65 points/W
TOTAL
1793 points/W
2535 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3340M
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
3384 points/GHz
3526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3273 points/GHz
5274 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/GHz
1289 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1337 points/GHz
1143 points/GHz
TOTAL
9288 points/GHz
11232 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4