| | | | | | |

Core i5-3340M vs i3-1005G1


Description
The i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 98.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
706e5
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.58k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
62.75k points
116.63k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3340M
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
11.93k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
11.13k
16.99k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
6.43k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
4.59k (x1.01)
TOTAL
31.58k
39.93k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-3340M

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
29.07k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
46.14k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.42k
19.47k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.18k (x0.98)
TOTAL
62.75k
98.86k (x1.58)

Performance/W
i5-3340M
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
645 points/W
1938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
728 points/W
3076 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
279 points/W
TOTAL
1793 points/W
6591 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3340M
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3384 points/GHz
3510 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3273 points/GHz
4996 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1337 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
9288 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4