| | | | | | |

Core i5-3340M vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the 3500U gets 146.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.3 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
810f81
Core
Ivy Bridge
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.58k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
62.75k points
140.97k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3340M
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
11.1k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
11.13k
18.97k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
3.9k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
3.39k (x0.75)
TOTAL
31.58k
37.37k (x1.18)

Multithread

i5-3340M

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
45.74k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
75.47k (x2.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.42k
21.89k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
3.49k (x0.82)
TOTAL
62.75k
146.6k (x2.34)

Performance/W
i5-3340M
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
645 points/W
3049 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
728 points/W
5032 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
1459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
233 points/W
TOTAL
1793 points/W
9773 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3340M
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3384 points/GHz
3001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3273 points/GHz
5128 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/GHz
1053 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1337 points/GHz
916 points/GHz
TOTAL
9288 points/GHz
10099 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4