| | | | | | |

Core i5-3337U vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 48.3 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 338.7 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 7 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
306f2
Core
Ivy Bridge
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2 /2
12/24
TDP
17 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2013
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3337U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
3.52k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
7.24k
8.68k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
2.83k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
3.13k (x0.93)
TOTAL
16.42k
18.17k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-3337U

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5.03k
32.7k (x6.5)
Test#2 (FP)
14.79k
105.18k (x7.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
35.18k (x4.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
9.54k (x2.1)
TOTAL
31.72k
182.59k (x5.76)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3337U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.64k
11.18k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
10.06k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.42k
3.21k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
3.12k (x0.97)
TOTAL
23.82k
27.57k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-3337U

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.28k
140.98k (x8.16)
Test#2 (FP)
19.67k
145.37k (x7.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.59k
45.62k (x6.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
6.75k (x1.8)
TOTAL
48.3k
338.73k (x7.01)

Performance/W
i5-3337U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1157 points/W
1211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
2841 points/W
2823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3201 points/GHz
3607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
3245 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
1007 points/GHz
TOTAL
8824 points/GHz
8894 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4