| | | | | | |

Core i5-3337U vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 48.3 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.1 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
406f1
Core
Ivy Bridge
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2 /2
8/16
TDP
17 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2013
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3337U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
2.6k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
7.24k
7.55k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
2.61k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
2.03k (x0.6)
TOTAL
16.42k
14.79k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-3337U

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5.03k
17.41k (x3.46)
Test#2 (FP)
14.79k
75.46k (x5.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
26.25k (x3.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
4.65k (x1.03)
TOTAL
31.72k
123.78k (x3.9)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3337U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.64k
6.04k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
10.18k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.42k
2.74k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
2.41k (x0.75)
TOTAL
23.82k
21.37k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-3337U

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.28k
47.51k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
19.67k
75.12k (x3.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.59k
19.72k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
5.45k (x1.45)
TOTAL
48.3k
147.8k (x3.06)

Performance/W
i5-3337U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/W
559 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1157 points/W
884 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
2841 points/W
1739 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3201 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
3393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
915 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
TOTAL
8824 points/GHz
7123 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4