Core i5-3337U vs Xeon E3-1225
Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 31.7 k points while the E3-1225 gets 44.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1225 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 31.7 k points while the E3-1225 gets 44.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1225 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
17 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2013
April 2011
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
23.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
68.97k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3337U
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
2.63k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
7.24k
7.2k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
3.71k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
2.55k (x0.76)
TOTAL
16.42k
16.08k (x0.98)
Multithread
i5-3337U
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
5.03k
8.23k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
14.79k
22.82k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
11.68k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
2.12k (x0.47)
TOTAL
31.72k
44.85k (x1.41)
Performance/W
i5-3337U
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
296 points/W
87 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
870 points/W
240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
267 points/W
22 points/W
TOTAL
1866 points/W
472 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
944 points/GHz
772 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2682 points/GHz
2117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1206 points/GHz
1091 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
750 points/GHz
TOTAL
6080 points/GHz
4731 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4