Core i5-3337U vs Pentium 4415U
Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 31.7 k points while the 4415U gets 36.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 31.7 k points while the 4415U gets 36.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
17 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
27.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
56.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3337U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
2.34k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
7.24k
9.51k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
3.05k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
2.59k (x0.77)
TOTAL
16.42k
17.49k (x1.07)
Multithread
i5-3337U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.03k
4.71k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
14.79k
21.73k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
7.35k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
2.43k (x0.54)
TOTAL
31.72k
36.22k (x1.14)
Performance/W
i5-3337U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
296 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
870 points/W
1449 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
490 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
267 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
1866 points/W
2415 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
944 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2682 points/GHz
4136 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1206 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
TOTAL
6080 points/GHz
7603 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4