Core i5-3337U vs Core 2 Quad Q8400
Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the Q8400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 31.7 k points while the Q8400 gets 47.1 k points.
Summarizing, the Q8400 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 31.7 k points while the Q8400 gets 47.1 k points.
Summarizing, the Q8400 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
1067a
Core
Ivy Bridge
Yorkfield
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
17 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2013
April 2009
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
14.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
51.92k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3337U
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
2.44k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
7.24k
6.24k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
2.62k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
1.43k (x0.42)
TOTAL
16.42k
12.73k (x0.78)
Multithread
i5-3337U
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
5.03k
9.71k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
14.79k
24.81k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
10.51k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
2.03k (x0.45)
TOTAL
31.72k
47.05k (x1.48)
Performance/W
i5-3337U
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
296 points/W
102 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
870 points/W
261 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
267 points/W
21 points/W
TOTAL
1866 points/W
495 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
944 points/GHz
916 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2682 points/GHz
2340 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1206 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
535 points/GHz
TOTAL
6080 points/GHz
4774 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4