| | | | | | |

Core i5-3337U vs i3-10100T


Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 48.3 k points while the i3-10100T gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 3.6 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
a0653
Core
Ivy Bridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/8
TDP
17 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
227.67k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3337U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
4.32k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
7.24k
15.7k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
5.04k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
7.68k (x2.28)
TOTAL
16.42k
32.73k (x1.99)

Multithread

i5-3337U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.03k
16.59k (x3.3)
Test#2 (FP)
14.79k
71.1k (x4.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
23.26k (x3.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
3.86k (x0.85)
TOTAL
31.72k
114.81k (x3.62)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3337U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.64k
13.88k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
20.94k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.42k
5.18k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
8.2k (x2.55)
TOTAL
23.82k
48.19k (x2.02)

Multithread

i5-3337U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.28k
54.88k (x3.18)
Test#2 (FP)
19.67k
93.17k (x4.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.59k
23.34k (x3.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
3.85k (x1.03)
TOTAL
48.3k
175.24k (x3.63)

Performance/W
i5-3337U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/W
844 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1157 points/W
1433 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
2841 points/W
2696 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3201 points/GHz
3228 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
4869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1204 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
1907 points/GHz
TOTAL
8824 points/GHz
11208 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4