| | | | | | |

Core i5-3337U vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 48.3 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.9 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
810f10
Core
Ivy Bridge
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/8
TDP
17 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3337U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
3.8k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
7.24k
17.38k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
5.17k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
3.16k (x0.94)
TOTAL
16.42k
29.52k (x1.8)

Multithread

i5-3337U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5.03k
15.28k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
14.79k
76.44k (x5.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
27.48k (x3.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
3.02k (x0.67)
TOTAL
31.72k
122.2k (x3.85)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3337U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.64k
13.04k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
22.35k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.42k
5.37k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
3.4k (x1.06)
TOTAL
23.82k
44.15k (x1.85)

Multithread

i5-3337U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.28k
56.49k (x3.27)
Test#2 (FP)
19.67k
100.74k (x5.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.59k
28.21k (x3.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
3.04k (x0.81)
TOTAL
48.3k
188.49k (x3.9)

Performance/W
i5-3337U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/W
869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1157 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
2841 points/W
2900 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3201 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
5731 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
TOTAL
8824 points/GHz
11321 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4