| | | | | | |

Core i5-3337U vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 48.3 k points while the 2200U gets 68.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
810f10
Core
Ivy Bridge
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
17 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
71.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3337U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
2.63k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
7.24k
7.84k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
3.63k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
2.93k (x0.87)
TOTAL
16.42k
17.02k (x1.04)

Multithread

i5-3337U

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.03k
5.77k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
14.79k
24.15k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
9.28k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
2.83k (x0.62)
TOTAL
31.72k
42.02k (x1.32)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3337U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.64k
11.54k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
19.69k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.42k
4.55k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
3.25k (x1.01)
TOTAL
23.82k
39.03k (x1.64)

Multithread

i5-3337U

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.28k
19.25k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
19.67k
36.27k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.59k
10.2k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
3.07k (x0.82)
TOTAL
48.3k
68.8k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i5-3337U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/W
1283 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1157 points/W
2418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
680 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
205 points/W
TOTAL
2841 points/W
4586 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3201 points/GHz
3394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
5792 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
956 points/GHz
TOTAL
8824 points/GHz
11480 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4