Core i5-3337U vs FX 8350
Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 48.3 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.4 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 48.3 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.4 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
600f20
Core
Ivy Bridge
Vishera
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2 /2
8/8
TDP
17 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2013
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3337U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
8.64k
9.85k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
8.41k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.42k
3.58k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
6.32k (x1.97)
TOTAL
23.82k
28.16k (x1.18)
Multithread
i5-3337U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
17.28k
44.93k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
19.67k
45.21k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.59k
22.81k (x3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
5.19k (x1.38)
TOTAL
48.3k
118.14k (x2.45)
Performance/W
i5-3337U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1157 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
2841 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3201 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
8824 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4