| | | | | | |

Core i5-3337U vs FX 4100


Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 4100 is based on Bulldozer.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 48.3 k points while the 4100 gets 44.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3337U is 1.1 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
600f12
Core
Ivy Bridge
Zambezi
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
17 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2013
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
22.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
44.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3337U
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.64k
7.65k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
6.9k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.42k
2.88k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
4.75k (x1.48)
TOTAL
23.82k
22.18k (x0.93)

Multithread

i5-3337U

4100
Test#1 (Integers)
17.28k
15.53k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
19.67k
15.13k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.59k
7.98k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
5.67k (x1.51)
TOTAL
48.3k
44.31k (x0.92)

Performance/W
i5-3337U
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/W
163 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1157 points/W
159 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
60 points/W
TOTAL
2841 points/W
466 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3201 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
1815 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
758 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
TOTAL
8824 points/GHz
5836 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4