| | | | | | |

Core i5-3330 vs i7-7560U


Description
The i5-3330 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3330 gets a score of 104.8 k points while the i7-7560U gets 89 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3330 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
77 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2012
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
29.84k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
104.78k points
97.27k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3330
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.85k
12.88k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
10.47k
20.02k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
4.15k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
8.97k (x2.08)
TOTAL
29.84k
46.02k (x1.54)

Multithread

i5-3330

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
41.77k
23k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
41.21k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.11k
9.92k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
14.9k (x2.22)
TOTAL
104.78k
89.03k (x0.85)

Performance/W
i5-3330
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
1533 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
522 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
209 points/W
661 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
994 points/W
TOTAL
1361 points/W
5935 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3330
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3390 points/GHz
3390 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3272 points/GHz
5268 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1092 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1347 points/GHz
2361 points/GHz
TOTAL
9325 points/GHz
12111 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4