Core i5-3330 vs i5-5200U
Description
The i5-3330 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3330 gets a score of 104.8 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3330 is 2.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3330 gets a score of 104.8 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3330 is 2.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306d4
Core
Ivy Bridge
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /4
TDP
77 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2012
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
29.84k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
104.78k points
68.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3330
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.85k
8.48k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
10.47k
12.03k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
3.32k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
2.79k (x0.65)
TOTAL
29.84k
26.62k (x0.89)
Multithread
i5-3330
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
41.77k
15.19k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
25.99k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.11k
6.71k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
2.96k (x0.44)
TOTAL
104.78k
50.85k (x0.49)
Performance/W
i5-3330
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
1013 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
522 points/W
1733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
209 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
1361 points/W
3390 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3330
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3390 points/GHz
3140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3272 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1347 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
9325 points/GHz
9860 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4