| | | | | | |

Core i5-3330 vs i3-7100U


Description
The i5-3330 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3330 gets a score of 104.8 k points while the i3-7100U gets 60.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3330 is 1.7 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
77 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2012
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
29.84k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
104.78k points
79.6k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3330
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.85k
8.76k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
10.47k
13.49k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
3.21k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.9k (x0.9)
TOTAL
29.84k
29.36k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-3330

i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
41.77k
18.33k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
31.08k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.11k
7.5k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
3.61k (x0.54)
TOTAL
104.78k
60.52k (x0.58)

Performance/W
i5-3330
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
1222 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
522 points/W
2072 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
209 points/W
500 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
240 points/W
TOTAL
1361 points/W
4035 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3330
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3390 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3272 points/GHz
5622 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1347 points/GHz
1624 points/GHz
TOTAL
9325 points/GHz
12235 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4