Core i5-3330 vs i3-10110U
Description
The i5-3330 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3330 gets a score of 104.8 k points while the i3-10110U gets 84.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3330 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3330 gets a score of 104.8 k points while the i3-10110U gets 84.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3330 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
806ec
Core
Ivy Bridge
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
77 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2012
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.84k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
104.78k points
106.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3330
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.85k
14.25k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
10.47k
21.55k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
5.16k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.26k (x0.99)
TOTAL
29.84k
45.22k (x1.52)
Multithread
i5-3330
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
41.77k
26.15k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
44.03k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.11k
10.71k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
3.28k (x0.49)
TOTAL
104.78k
84.17k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i5-3330
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
1743 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
522 points/W
2935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
209 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
218 points/W
TOTAL
1361 points/W
5611 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3330
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3390 points/GHz
3476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3272 points/GHz
5256 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1258 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1347 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
TOTAL
9325 points/GHz
11029 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4