| | | | | | |

Core i5-3330 vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i5-3330 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3330 gets a score of 104.8 k points while the 1700 gets 381.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 3.6 times faster than the i5-3330 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
800f11
Core
Ivy Bridge
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
77 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2012
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
29.84k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
104.78k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3330
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
10.85k
13.95k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
10.47k
22.02k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
5.17k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
16.61k (x3.85)
TOTAL
29.84k
57.75k (x1.94)

Multithread

i5-3330

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
41.77k
120.59k (x2.89)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
197.34k (x4.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.11k
56.83k (x3.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.41k (x0.96)
TOTAL
104.78k
381.16k (x3.64)

Performance/W
i5-3330
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
1855 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
522 points/W
3036 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
209 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
1361 points/W
5864 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3330
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3390 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3272 points/GHz
5952 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1347 points/GHz
4490 points/GHz
TOTAL
9325 points/GHz
15609 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4