Core i5-3320M vs Celeron N4100
Description
The i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 54.6 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.3 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 54.6 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.3 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
706a1
Core
Ivy Bridge
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
June 2012
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
40.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3320M
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
10.89k
4.72k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
9.77k
6.99k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
2.69k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
2.81k (x0.75)
TOTAL
28.4k
17.21k (x0.61)
Multithread
i5-3320M
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
20.23k
12.54k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
20.83k
17.99k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.49k
6.71k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
3.33k (x0.82)
TOTAL
54.6k
40.57k (x0.74)
Performance/W
i5-3320M
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
578 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
595 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
1560 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3300 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2960 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1205 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1141 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
8607 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4