Core i5-3320M vs FX 9590
Description
The i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 2.3 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 2.3 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
600f20
Core
Ivy Bridge
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
35 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2012
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3320M
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
11.51k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
10.53k
9.57k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
4.19k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
7.14k (x1.8)
TOTAL
29.22k
32.41k (x1.11)
Multithread
i5-3320M
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
21.27k
55.13k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
23.93k
51.69k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.48k
27.02k (x2.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
3.81k (x0.92)
TOTAL
58.81k
137.65k (x2.34)
Performance/W
i5-3320M
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
608 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
684 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
1680 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3225 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3191 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1234 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1203 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
8853 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4