| | | | | | |

Core i5-3317U vs Xeon E5506


Description
The i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5506 is 2 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
106a5
Core
Ivy Bridge
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4 /4
TDP
17 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2012
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.31k points
90.45k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3317U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
2.5k
1.21k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
7.18k
2.75k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.19k
1.94k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
0.78k (x0.23)
TOTAL
16.27k
6.68k (x0.41)

Multithread

i5-3317U

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4.93k
12.25k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
15.72k
25.55k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.53k
17.1k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
5.01k (x1.19)
TOTAL
32.39k
59.9k (x1.85)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3317U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
8.38k
4.48k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
7.76k
2.99k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
1.81k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
0.69k (x0.2)
TOTAL
22.88k
9.97k (x0.44)

Multithread

i5-3317U

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
41k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
16.79k
28.17k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.85k
17.4k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.02k
3.88k (x0.96)
TOTAL
45.23k
90.45k (x2)

Performance/W
i5-3317U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
974 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
988 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
237 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
2660 points/W
1131 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3317U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3225 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2984 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1281 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1311 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
8801 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4