| | | | | | |

Core i5-3317U vs Core 2 Duo E8400


Description
The i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E8400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3317U is 1.7 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
1067a
Core
Ivy Bridge
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/2
TDP
17 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2012
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
17.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.31k points
27.11k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3317U
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.5k
2.47k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
7.18k
6.74k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.19k
2.87k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
4.47k (x1.31)
TOTAL
16.27k
16.55k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-3317U

E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.93k
4.64k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
15.72k
12.36k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.53k
4.86k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
1.96k (x0.47)
TOTAL
32.39k
23.82k (x0.74)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3317U
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
8.38k
3.3k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
7.76k
7.28k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
2.88k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
3.83k (x1.12)
TOTAL
22.88k
17.28k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-3317U

E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
6.3k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
16.79k
13.71k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.85k
5.32k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.02k
1.78k (x0.44)
TOTAL
45.23k
27.11k (x0.6)

Performance/W
i5-3317U
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
974 points/W
97 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
988 points/W
211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
82 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
237 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
2660 points/W
417 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3317U
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
3225 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2984 points/GHz
2426 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1281 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1311 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
8801 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4