| | | | | | |

Core i5-3317U vs i7-4702MQ


Description
The i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 32.4 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 75.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 2.3 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
306c3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4 /8
TDP
17 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2012
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.31k points
145.15k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3317U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2.5k
3.45k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
7.18k
8.53k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.19k
3.99k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
3.51k (x1.03)
TOTAL
16.27k
19.47k (x1.2)

Multithread

i5-3317U

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4.93k
11.93k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
15.72k
42.4k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.53k
18k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
3.6k (x0.85)
TOTAL
32.39k
75.92k (x2.34)

Performance/W
i5-3317U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
290 points/W
323 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
925 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
443 points/W
486 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
248 points/W
97 points/W
TOTAL
1906 points/W
2052 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3317U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
963 points/GHz
1078 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2760 points/GHz
2665 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1311 points/GHz
1096 points/GHz
TOTAL
6259 points/GHz
6085 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4