Core i5-3317U vs i5-2467M
Description
The i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-2467M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 41.3 k points while the i5-2467M gets 29.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3317U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-2467M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 41.3 k points while the i5-2467M gets 29.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3317U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-2467M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/2
TDP
17 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
14.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.31k points
29.78k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3317U
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.11k
5.4k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
6.58k
4.9k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.48k
2.4k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.71k
2.09k (x0.77)
TOTAL
17.88k
14.78k (x0.83)
Multithread
i5-3317U
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
11.67k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
16.8k
10.74k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.66k
5.09k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
2.28k (x0.55)
TOTAL
41.31k
29.78k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i5-3317U
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
804 points/W
686 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
988 points/W
632 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
392 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
246 points/W
134 points/W
TOTAL
2430 points/W
1752 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3317U
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
2351 points/GHz
2347 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2532 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
953 points/GHz
1042 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
907 points/GHz
TOTAL
6879 points/GHz
6424 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4