| | | | | | |

Core i5-3317U vs i3-3120M


Description
Both models i5-3317U and i3-3120M are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.

"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 41.3 k points while the i3-3120M gets 47.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-3120M is 1.2 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2 /2
TDP
17 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
22.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.31k points
47.78k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3317U
i3-3120M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.11k
7.92k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
6.58k
7.96k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.48k
3.09k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.71k
3.15k (x1.16)
TOTAL
17.88k
22.12k (x1.24)

Multithread

i5-3317U

i3-3120M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
16.82k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
16.8k
19k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.66k
7.7k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
4.25k (x1.02)
TOTAL
41.31k
47.78k (x1.16)

Performance/W
i5-3317U
i3-3120M
Test#1 (Integers)
804 points/W
481 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
988 points/W
543 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
392 points/W
220 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
246 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
2430 points/W
1365 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3317U
i3-3120M
Test#1 (Integers)
2351 points/GHz
3169 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2532 points/GHz
3182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
953 points/GHz
1236 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
TOTAL
6879 points/GHz
8847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4