| | | | | | |

Core i5-3317U vs Celeron J4105


Description
The i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
706a1
Core
Ivy Bridge
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
17 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2012
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.31k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3317U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.5k
1.68k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
7.18k
5.29k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.19k
2.75k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
3.44k (x1.01)
TOTAL
16.27k
13.16k (x0.81)

Multithread

i5-3317U

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.93k
6.39k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
15.72k
20.02k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.53k
10.22k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
4.94k (x1.17)
TOTAL
32.39k
41.57k (x1.28)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3317U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
8.38k
4.9k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
7.76k
7.26k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
2.75k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
3.32k (x0.97)
TOTAL
22.88k
18.22k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-3317U

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
18.84k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
16.79k
27.45k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.85k
10.35k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.02k
4.85k (x1.21)
TOTAL
45.23k
61.49k (x1.36)

Performance/W
i5-3317U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
974 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
988 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
237 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
2660 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3317U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3225 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2984 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1281 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1311 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
8801 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4